Welcome guest
You're not logged in.
287 users online, thereof 0 logged in


The central focus of BoP is mathematics, theoretical physics and computer scienses. Why this focus and what do these sciences have to do with the axiomatic method?

In order to answer this question, let us first ask and answer another question: Is mathematics a natural science or does it belong to humanities?

Most of the mathematical objects and disciplines deal, in fact, with natural phenomena. However, note that the objects, which mathematicians usually deal with, i.e. numbers, vectors, matrices, equations, functions, are purely abstract. They only exist within the human mind, they are a pure product of the human thought.

Therefore, an answer to the second question can be that mathematics neither belongs to natural sciences nor to humanities. In fact, it belongs to the third kind of sciences – the structural sciences. Structural sciences deal with patterns and structures. For instance, in mathematics,

  • the disciplines of geometry study the patterns and structures of space,
  • differential equations describe the patterns and structures of movement,
  • probability theory and statistics deal with the patterns and structures of randomness,
  • logic is the discipline studying the patterns and structures governing formal argumentation,
  • topology fathoms the patterns and structures of position and location.

Like mathematics, also theoretical physics and computer sciences belong to structural sciences. And this is what BoP is dedicated to. The axiomatic method is a pillar of structural sciences. Therefore, structural sciences are predestined to demonstrate what axiomatic method is and how powerful and useful it is for these sciences.

| | | | created: 2017-11-27 21:13:49 | modified: 2017-11-28 00:34:17 | by: bookofproofs | references: [641]

1.What is the axiomatic method?

2.Is the axiomatic method important for education?

3.Criticisim of the axiomatic method

This work was contributed under CC BY-SA 3.0 by:

This work is a derivative of:


Bibliography (further reading)

[641] Govers, Timothy: “The Princeton Companion to Mathematics”, Princeton University Press, 2008

FeedsAcknowledgmentsTerms of UsePrivacy PolicyImprint
© 2018 Powered by BooOfProofs, All rights reserved.