log in sign up
logo

Explanation: What is special about transitive sets?

deleteeditadd to favorites[id:726]   
vote:
last edited 0 min ago by bookofproofs

The defining principle of transitive sets is that its elements are also its subsets, i.e. if from \(Y\in Z\) it follows that \(Y\subseteq Z\), then \(Z\) is transitive. This is equivalent to the following:

If \(Y\subseteq Z\), then each element \(X\in Y\) is also an element of \(X\in Z\). So altogether, transitivity means nothing else then

\[X\in Y\wedge Y\in Z\Longrightarrow X\in Z.\]

Let us consider some examples to get a better idea what it means.

Example 1 - Elements of the infinite Zermelo set

Zermelo used a special set to postulate his axiom of infinity. Let us consider the first elements of this set. We find that only the first two elements are transitive, all other are not:

\(\emptyset\) is transitive.
\(\{\emptyset\}\) is transitive, since from \(\emptyset\in\{\emptyset\}\) it follows that \(\emptyset\subseteq\{\emptyset\}\).
\(\{\{\emptyset\}\}\) is not transitive, since \(\{\emptyset\}\not\subseteq\{\{\emptyset\}\}\), although \(\{\emptyset\}\in\{\{\emptyset\}\}\).
\(\{\{\{\emptyset\}\}\}\) is not transitive, since \(\{\{\emptyset\}\}\not\subseteq\{\{\{\emptyset\}\}\}\), although \(\{\{\emptyset\}\}\in\{\{\{\emptyset\}\}\}\).
Analogously, \(\{\{\{\{\emptyset\}\}\}\}\) is not transitive.
Analogously, \(\{\{\{\{\{\emptyset\}\}\}\}\}\) is not transitive.

Example 2 - Elements of the infinite Zermelo set - revised

We can, however, construct transitive sets \(T_n\) from the elements of the Zermelo set, which are \(X_0:=\emptyset,~X_n:=\{X_{n-1}\}\), by combining any first \(n\) of them into new sets according to the following rule: \(T_0:=X_0,~T_n:=\bigcup_{0\le k\le n} X_k\).

For any \(T_n\) we have then: If \(X_k\in T_n\) for \(1\le k\le n\), then by definition \(X_k=\{X_{k-1}\}\). However, \(\{X_{k-1}\}\) is a subset of \(T_n\), so \(T_n\) is transitive.

Example 3 - Elements of the infinite von Neumann set

Another example of transitive sets are the elements of the von Neumann set used to axiomatically postulate the existence of infinity:

To see their transitivity you can consider some examples or realize that all elements of the von Neumann infinite set follow a special construction principle that with \(X\) also \(X\cup \{X\}\) has to be an element of his set, starting with the transitive set \(\emptyset\). Now, a general property of transitive sets is that \(X\cup \{X\}\) must be transitive, if \(X\) is already transitive. Therefore, all von Neumann elements built this way must be transitive!

It is no accident that by consequently re-applying the construction principles fort transitive sets we inevitably come out with infinite many different transitive sets. The transitive sets open the door into the systematical study of infinite sets, which is a fascinating journey beyond our imagination.

Further Reading

[656] Hoffmann, Dirk W.: “Grenzen der Mathematik - Eine Reise durch die Kerngebiete der mathematischen Logik”, Spektrum Akademischer Verlag, 2011

Contribute to BoP:


Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Imprint | This site is a private offer. All rights reserved.
The contents of book of proofs are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.